Search results

The Pfeiffer Maltese Quad Antenna System presents a unique approach to traditional quad antennas by utilizing a linear loading technique. This method effectively reduces the overall size of the antenna while maintaining its performance capabilities. Designed by Andrew Pfeiffer, the antenna's configuration resembles a Maltese cross, which not only enhances its structural integrity but also allows it to withstand challenging environmental conditions. This system is adaptable, offering various configurations from a 4-spreader Maltese Quad to a 16-spreader Maltese Quadruple-Cross, making it suitable for operators looking to optimize their setup without sacrificing efficiency. This antenna system is particularly versatile, covering multiple bands including 40, 20, 17, 12, and 10 meters. The design focuses on minimizing the physical footprint while ensuring effective signal transmission and reception. Amateur radio operators can benefit from the detailed plans available in the accompanying PDF, which outlines the construction process and specifications. Whether you're a seasoned DXer or a newcomer to the hobby, the Pfeiffer Maltese Quad Antenna System offers a practical solution for enhancing your station's capabilities.

The Cubical Quad antenna is a popular choice among amateur radio operators due to its robust design and excellent performance characteristics. This resource provides essential scaling formulas that help determine the lengths of the antenna elements and the necessary gamma match values for various frequencies. The design is adaptable, allowing operators to optimize for gain or front-to-back ratio by adjusting the spacing between elements. The accompanying Excel files facilitate precise calculations, making it easier for both beginners and experienced hams to construct their own Cubical Quad antennas. In addition to the design formulas, the resource includes practical insights from the author, who has successfully built and utilized these antennas in various field events. The document outlines the tuning process for achieving minimum VSWR, ensuring optimal performance. With detailed illustrations and performance data, this guide serves as a comprehensive reference for anyone looking to delve into Cubical Quad antenna construction and optimization, enhancing their amateur radio experience.

This article describes how to make a quadrifilar helix (QFH) antenna easily, from inexpensive materials: uPVC plumbing pipe and RG-58U co-axial cable. A low-cost, easy-to-build Quadrifilar Helix (QFH) antenna for weather satellite reception using uPVC plumbing pipe and RG-58U coaxial cable. Unlike traditional designs requiring copper pipe and plumbing skills, this approach enables construction with basic tools and minimal technical expertise. The antenna's shorter, wider proportions favor higher elevation angles, reducing interference from horizon-level pager transmitters. Electrical connections are simplified at the antenna's apex, with the coaxial cable forming the radiating elements. Testing demonstrated consistent signal strength throughout satellite passes, proving effective weather satellite reception is achievable without precision engineering to sub-millimeter tolerances.

A compact Quad Antenna for the HF Bands by GM0ONX

This page presents an online calculator tool for determining the dimensions of various HF wire antennas operating between 1.8-30 MHz. Users input their desired resonant frequency to obtain precise measurements for four popular antenna types: standard flat-top dipole, inverted Vee, quad loop, and equilateral delta loop. The calculator provides comprehensive measurements including leg lengths, minimum heights, horizontal spreads, and feedpoint distances. Accompanying the calculator are detailed technical explanations, construction notes, and installation guidelines for each antenna type, making it a practical resource for amateur radio operators building their own antennas.

The Shrunken Quad antenna is a unique design that offers full-sized performance on the 10m and 15m bands while incorporating linear loading via a trap for operation on the 20m band. This design allows for effective communication in the HF spectrum, making it suitable for both casual operators and serious DXers. The quad configuration provides excellent gain and directivity, which is beneficial for contesting and long-distance contacts. Constructing the Shrunken Quad involves careful attention to dimensions and materials to ensure optimal performance. The antenna's compact nature makes it an excellent choice for limited space situations, allowing operators to enjoy the benefits of a quad without the need for extensive real estate. This project is ideal for amateur radio enthusiasts looking to enhance their station's capabilities with a versatile and efficient antenna system.

Chavdar Levkov, LZ1AQ, presents an experimental comparison of small wideband magnetic loops, building on his previous work on wideband active small magnetic loop antennas. His research focuses on increasing loop sensitivity by maximizing the short-circuit current, which is directly tied to the "loop factor" M = A/L, where A is the equivalent loop area and L is its inductance. Levkov's methodology involves reducing inductance and increasing area through parallel or coplanar crossed (CC) configurations, comparing these designs against a reference single quad loop of 1 m2 area. Experimental verification included testing three distinct loop types: a simple quad loop, two coplanar crossed (CC) loops, and eight parallel loops, all designed to have a total geometric area of 1 m2. Measurements were conducted at 1.8, 3.5, 7, and 10 MHz using a small transmitter 270 meters away, with a Perseus direct sampling receiver for precise signal level assessment. The results consistently showed that CC loops, particularly Loop 5 (two CC circular loops with 1.44 m2 total area), yielded significantly higher currents, up to 9.1 dB over the reference loop at 3.5 MHz, validating M as a reliable predictor of loop sensitivity. Numerical simulations using MMANA further corroborated the experimental findings, demonstrating an almost perfect correlation between the calculated M factor and the induced loop current for 15 different loop models. Levkov concludes that CC loops offer superior sensitivity for a given loop area, while parallel loops are advantageous for minimizing physical volume. Practical recommendations suggest using loops with an M factor greater than 0.5 uA/pT for quiet rural environments, and he provides a spreadsheet tool, WLoop_calc.xls, to aid in optimizing loop configurations for specific operational needs.