Search results

Demonstrates the construction of a **multi-band HF mobile antenna** utilizing a modified CB whip antenna base. The resource details the process of stripping a commercial CB whip, winding a new helical coil with 0.7mm insulated copper wire, and identifying tapping points for various HF bands. It emphasizes the importance of a rugged, slim design for mobile operation, discussing mechanical length, power handling (up to 200 watts), and coil diameter considerations. The article includes a graphic illustrating the antenna's operational principle, where sections of the helical coil are shorted from bottom to top to maintain efficiency and high Q. The resource presents a practical approach to achieving **band switching** without an external tuner, by manually adjusting tapping points on the coil. It provides a table with reference lengths in centimeters from the feedpoint for 7 MHz (40m) through 28.7 MHz (10m), including WARC bands. The author details mounting techniques, suggesting a Diamond bracket for secure attachment to a vehicle trunk, and stresses the critical role of proper grounding for optimal performance. The design allows for operation on 75m and 80m bands by adding a 110mm steel whip.

The 6 Band Inverted L Antenna MK3 is a versatile multiband antenna designed for amateur radio operators. This antenna covers 160m, 80m, 40m, 20m, 15m, and 10m bands, making it suitable for a wide range of HF communications. The design is based on a W3DZZ configuration, incorporating traps for optimal performance. The MK3 version features a sturdy 5/8th CB mast, replacing the original timber mast, which enhances durability against harsh weather conditions. The antenna's construction allows for effective operation, particularly on the 40m band, where it has been successfully used to contact distant locations including ZL, VK, and Antarctica. Constructing this antenna requires careful attention to detail, especially regarding the radials and grounding. The traps resonate at specific frequencies, and additional resources are available for building coaxial traps. The antenna is designed to work efficiently without an ATU on the lower bands, while higher bands may require tuning. This project is ideal for both beginner and intermediate operators looking to enhance their station with a reliable multiband antenna.

The Elecraft K2 transceiver requires specific modifications for optimal soundcard digital mode operation, particularly for PSK31. The original article, circa 2001, details initial challenges with manual PTT and speech compression settings. A key modification involves adding headphone audio and a compression disable signal to the K2's microphone jack, utilizing pins 4 and 5. The **COMP0** signal, active low, is shorted to ground via a non-inverting open collector switch circuit, comprising two resistors and two transistors, mounted on the SSB board near U3. This circuit provides effective control of an analog signal line with good noise immunity. The switchbox itself repurposes a computer COM port switch, using only two of its original connectors and four of the nine poles. It integrates a microphone preamplifier, a PTT circuit built with 'flying leads' construction, and RCA jacks for soundcard connections. A trimpot adjusts the audio drive to the K2. The central DB9 connector links to the K2's mic connector via a shielded RS232 serial cable, ensuring proper grounding and signal routing. An external footswitch PTT jack is also included. Further enhancements include a **noise-canceling microphone** preamp based on a QST December 2000 article, adapted for Heil mic elements. This preamp, built with pseudo-Manhattan style construction, provides a gain of approximately 2 by changing emitter resistors (R9 and R16) from 680 ohms to 330 ohms. A 10-ohm series resistor and 47 µF capacitor on the +5V supply mitigate noise spikes.

1500 watts PEP output from a Kenwood TL-922 amplifier requires careful attention to parasitic suppression and component selection to ensure stability and longevity. This resource critically examines common modifications, often based on anecdotal evidence rather than sound engineering principles, that can degrade performance or introduce new issues. It highlights how replacing aged components often gets misattributed to the efficacy of unnecessary modifications, leading to widespread misinformation within the amateur radio community regarding amplifier stability. The article details specific, effective modifications for the TL-922, such as shortening anode-to-chassis and anode-to-grid paths to improve VHF stability and efficiency. It addresses issues like incorrect capacitor types in the tank circuit, inadequate grid grounding, and poor RF sheet metal design, providing practical solutions like adding direct ground connections for the plate tune variable capacitor. The author also discusses proper parasitic suppressor design, emphasizing the importance of lead length and component selection for optimal performance and harmonic suppression, contrasting these with less effective or detrimental 'magical suppression kits'.

The _G3TSO_ Mobile Antenna Page details construction and tuning methods for mobile antennas operating across **10 to 160 metres**. The content describes a Hustler-based design, optimized for RF performance and vehicle speeds, featuring centre loading. For optimal operation on various bands, the loading coil placement requires clearance from the vehicle body. Antenna resonance is critical for efficient mobile operation. A mobile antenna's base impedance may be as low as 27 ohms, requiring specific matching to achieve maximum radiation, as a minimum SWR at the transmitter does not always indicate resonance or maximum output. Tuning involves physical adjustment of antenna length to achieve resonance at the operating frequency. The _G3TSO_ page outlines a tuning procedure utilizing a low-power signal source and a field strength meter to identify maximum radiation before impedance matching. Loading coil placement, either at the base, center, or top of the antenna, influences radiation efficiency and mechanical stability for mobile installations. Centre-loaded whips, such as the Hustler design, offer a compromise between efficiency and stability, often for single-band operation. Helically wound antennas, including those for **28 MHz**, may present base impedances around 17 ohms, resulting in a 3:1 SWR at resonance. Low resistance grounding at the antenna base is also specified for optimizing performance and minimizing RFI during mobile operation. DXZone Focus: Mobile | Any | Antenna Tuning | HF

The 222 MHz Transverter project, based on Zack Lau's (W1VT) original July 1993 QEX magazine design, provides an IF of 28 MHz for both transmit and receive paths. Rick Bandla (VE3CVG) contributed supplemental notes and construction details, including modifications to achieve 10 mW output power from an initial 4 mW PEP. The design incorporates three distinct boards: a Local Oscillator (LO), a Transmitter (Tx), and a Receiver (Rx), with an estimated parts cost of just over $150 CDN, significantly less than commercial kits. Construction involves both through-hole and surface-mount components, with specific guidance on mounting MAV and MAR devices, grounding techniques, and component selection. The project details include parts lists, schematics for the LO, Tx, and Rx, and board layouts. Troubleshooting advice emphasizes sequential testing, starting with the LO, then Tx, and finally Rx, using a 194 MHz and 222.100 MHz capable FM handheld for signal tracing. Further enhancements are discussed, such as an optional Tx driver stage to boost output to 100 mW and the potential modification of a Motorola Maxor 80 PA for 222 MHz SSB/CW operation. The resource also covers practical aspects like power attenuation pads for IF radios (e.g., FT817) and considerations for enclosure design, including repurposing a Maxor 80 case. Performance reports indicate successful 70 km contacts with only 4 mW output.

This page provides a detailed comparison between the Zero Five and Gap Titan ham radio antennas. The author shares their personal experience with both antennas, highlighting pros and cons for each. They discuss aspects such as ease of assembly, customer service, tuning capabilities, performance on different bands, and the need for grounding and tuning. The comparison aims to help readers make an informed decision on choosing the best antenna for their needs, based on real-world usage scenarios and feedback.