Search results

An inverted V Dipole antenna for HF bands, working on 10 20 40 and 80 meters band. PDF Presentation

A light and sturdy Quad for 10 and 15 meters. Basic Quad antenna design considerations. Building and assembling a dual band HF QUAD antenna, designing and joining cross-arms and boom, assembling spreader and element wire installation notes. QST article.

Quads beams consist of 2 1 wavelength (approximately) loops, ordinarily arranged so that one is the driven element and the other is the reflector. In this project author explains how to build a two element Quad Antenna for the 28 MHz.

Building A Full-Wave Quad Loop Antenna for 6 Meters. This is an easy antenna to build and the materials cost about $15-20. It exhibits 1.8dB gain over a 1/2-wave dipole. Using an open-wire parallel feedline (commonly called ladder line) with an antenna tuner, it tunes up on the 10m band as a 5/8-wave loop as well

A Different way to construct a tried and true antenna out of PVC, especially for the 10 meter and higher frequencies.

A 14.12 dBi gain three elements cubical quad antenna for the six meters band. This Quad Antenna design page include a MMA model available to download and dimensions for each element.

Constructing a 5-element quad antenna, the author aimed for low cost and simplicity, resulting in an effective design with 11 dBi gain and SWR of 2:1 or better across the 2-meter band. Using wood and dowels, the antenna costs under $8 and takes less than two hours to build with basic tools. The model predicts excellent performance, confirmed by ARRL Lab measurements. Practical field results demonstrate improved communication, even in simplex mode.

A multi-band trapped dipole antenna working on 20, 40, 75 and 160 meters band. This project implement a 20 meter trap unadilla reyco KW-20, 40 meter trap Unadilla Reyco KW-40 and a HI-Q 1:1 balun feed.

The Pikes Peak Radio Amateur Association (PPRAA) serves as an ARRL Special Service Club, providing a calendar of events and activities for its members and the wider amateur radio community. The resource details upcoming events such as the USS Pueblo Memorial Museum Ships Weekend activations, a Cubical Quad Antenna Workshop, LARCFest, and various hamfests including Dayton Hamvention and Duke City Hamfest. It also lists on-air activities like a FreeDV digital voice mode event on 10 meters, a Black Friday Simplex Event on 2M and 70cm, and a 10m event for Technician class operators, emphasizing SSB privileges from 28.300 to 28.500 MHz. The PPRAA's event schedule includes educational opportunities like a Technician Class and a Soldering Workshop, alongside social gatherings such as the PPRAA Picnic and Car Show. Past event summaries highlight successful activities like the 2024 Megafest Raffle, Winter Field Day, and multiple fox hunts utilizing frequencies like 147.420, 147.480, and 147.540 MHz. The club actively supports POTA activations, exemplified by their AF0S park activation at Cheyenne Mountain State Park, and participates in historical commemorations like the USS Pueblo Memorial operations, demonstrating a broad engagement across various amateur radio facets.

Chavdar Levkov, LZ1AQ, presents an experimental comparison of small wideband magnetic loops, building on his previous work on wideband active small magnetic loop antennas. His research focuses on increasing loop sensitivity by maximizing the short-circuit current, which is directly tied to the "loop factor" M = A/L, where A is the equivalent loop area and L is its inductance. Levkov's methodology involves reducing inductance and increasing area through parallel or coplanar crossed (CC) configurations, comparing these designs against a reference single quad loop of 1 m2 area. Experimental verification included testing three distinct loop types: a simple quad loop, two coplanar crossed (CC) loops, and eight parallel loops, all designed to have a total geometric area of 1 m2. Measurements were conducted at 1.8, 3.5, 7, and 10 MHz using a small transmitter 270 meters away, with a Perseus direct sampling receiver for precise signal level assessment. The results consistently showed that CC loops, particularly Loop 5 (two CC circular loops with 1.44 m2 total area), yielded significantly higher currents, up to 9.1 dB over the reference loop at 3.5 MHz, validating M as a reliable predictor of loop sensitivity. Numerical simulations using MMANA further corroborated the experimental findings, demonstrating an almost perfect correlation between the calculated M factor and the induced loop current for 15 different loop models. Levkov concludes that CC loops offer superior sensitivity for a given loop area, while parallel loops are advantageous for minimizing physical volume. Practical recommendations suggest using loops with an M factor greater than 0.5 uA/pT for quiet rural environments, and he provides a spreadsheet tool, WLoop_calc.xls, to aid in optimizing loop configurations for specific operational needs.