Search results

This comprehensive three-part guide examines baluns (balanced-to-unbalanced devices) and their critical role in ham radio antenna systems. The author explains how baluns prevent common-mode currents on feedlines, which can distort radiation patterns and cause unwanted RF in the shack. Various balun types are analyzed, including coiled coax chokes, ferrite-core designs (W2DU), and toroidal-wound versions (Guanella/Ruthroff). Construction techniques for 1:1, 4:1, 6:1, and 9:1 current baluns are provided with practical guidance on wire selection, winding methods, and ferrite core properties. The article emphasizes that proper balun implementation is essential for optimal antenna performance, especially with directional arrays.

Phased array antennas are composed of multiple individual antenna elements that can have their phase and amplitude controlled to steer the main beam direction in real-time. They are used in radar, communications, and electronic warfare, and offer improved gain and reduced side lobes. A comprehensive document on Phased Arrays include techniques to increase the Antenna Gain and change the Radiation Pattern

This paper by Leif Asbrink (SM 5 BSZ) presents a practical approach to designing very high gain Yagi antennas, focusing on the "brute force" optimization method. The method, described in a previous article, ensures convergence independent of initial guesses. The paper provides detailed tables of element lengths and positions for Yagi antennas optimized for 144.1 MHz with a 50-ohm feed point impedance, aiming for minimal losses and high accuracy in comparisons.

This PDF document discusses the setup and operation of UHF vertical dipole phased stack antennas for hams. It covers the advantages, principles, and practical aspects of using this type of antenna configuration. The document is a useful resource for amateur radio operators looking to improve their UHF station setup with phased array antennas.

The TY0RU DXpedition to Benin in 2022 achieved over **100,000 QSOs** from Cotonou, IOTA AF-051, operating across 160m through 6m bands using CW, SSB, and FT8 modes. The operation involved a team of 12 operators, including _F5RAV_, _F4WBN_, and _F1TCV_, utilizing multiple stations with transceivers like the Icom IC-7300 and IC-7610, paired with amplifiers and various antennas such as verticals, dipoles, and a 4-square array for 40m. The expedition's log is available on Club Log, supporting OQRS for both direct and bureau QSLs, with F5RAV serving as the QSL manager. The site details the team's travel, setup, and operational challenges, including local conditions and equipment deployment, offering insights into the logistical complexities of activating a rare DXCC entity. Donors are acknowledged, and a photo gallery documents the activity.

This project describes a high-performance EME antenna array consisting of two home-designed 9-element Yagis, each about 2.5 wavelengths long, combined into a 25-ohm system and matched to 100 ohms using 9/4λ sections of 50-ohm coax. The array supports rotatable polarity from 0° to 180°, allowing both horizontal and vertical polarization to optimize moonbounce performance under varying conditions. Despite operating for years without a balun—something another designer called “disastrous”—the system has delivered strong results, including copying very weak DX such as VK3KH at about -25 dB with only 120 W (around 2 kW ERP). The builder continues to refine the mechanics, having installed new gear motors and an upgraded follow-up control system in 2011.

Details the construction and performance of a phase-controlled receiving array, specifically a **MicroSWA** variant, optimized for QRP low band fox hunting on 40M and 80M. The resource documents the author's iterative design process, addressing significant regional noise challenges encountered during 0100-0230 UTC fox hunt periods. Initial experiments involved a director wire on a 40M vertical, yielding limited improvement, prompting a shift towards advanced null-steering techniques. The project leverages concepts from Victor Misek’s "The Beverage Antenna Handbook" and Dallas Lankford’s extensive work on phased receiving antennas for urban lots. A key modification involved integrating a new passive phase control box and a push-pull **Norton common base preamp** using 2N5109 transistors, designed for high third-order intercept performance to maintain weak signal integrity amidst strong adjacent signals. The system incorporates Faraday-shielded transformers with RG174 primaries on -75 ferrite cores, housed in ABS plastic pipe. Performance tests confirmed the MicroSWA's ability to produce deep, steerable nulls, achieving approximately 30 dB noise reduction on 160M, 80M, and 40M. This enabled detection of QRP signals undetectable on conventional transmit antennas. The final unit includes front panel controls, a 10-11 dB preamp, and a robust power conditioner, demonstrating effective noise mitigation for challenging low band QRP operations.

Early 20th-century transatlantic wireless communication efforts involved distinct technical approaches by Reginald Fessenden and Guglielmo Marconi. Marconi's systems, operational until approximately 1912, primarily utilized _spark technology_ for wireless telegraphy, facilitating Morse code communication between ships and across oceans. His Poldhu station in December 1901 radiated signals in the MF band around 850 kHz, later evolving to 272 kHz in October 1902, and eventually 45 kHz by late 1907 with increasingly larger antenna structures like the pyramidal monopole and capacitive top-loaded arrays. Fessenden, conversely, focused on _continuous wave transmission_ for wireless telephony, recognizing its necessity for speech. His transatlantic experiments in 1906 employed synchronous rotary-spark-gap transmitters and 420-foot umbrella top-loaded antennas at Brant Rock, MA, and Machrihanish, Scotland, tuned to approximately 80 kHz. Fessenden later utilized the _Alexanderson HF alternator_ at 75 kHz by late 1906 for pure CW transmission, integrating a carbon microphone for amplitude modulation. Receiver technology also differed, with Marconi initially relying on untuned coherer-type detectors, later developing the magnetic detector in 1902, while Fessenden's CW approach necessitated more advanced detection methods.