Search results

The boomless quad antenna is a unique design that offers versatility for amateur radio operators. This antenna consists of two half-wave dipoles arranged in a square or circular shape, allowing for both vertical and horizontal polarization depending on the feed point. The design facilitates easy installation and rotation, making it suitable for various operating conditions. The construction utilizes strong materials, such as bamboo, and incorporates waterproofing techniques to enhance durability. This project outlines the necessary dimensions and materials, including copper wire and insulators, to successfully build the antenna. It emphasizes the importance of tuning each radiator element for optimal performance. The boomless quad is particularly effective across multiple HF bands, including 14 MHz, 21 MHz, and 28 MHz. By following the detailed instructions, operators can achieve a reliable and efficient antenna setup that enhances their DXing and contesting capabilities.

4 Element Cubical Quad, Yagis, LZA Circular Quad, Shrunken Quad , quarter wave, J-Pole, beam mounting , changing polarity

This is an antenna that author just built. Was intend for receiving the AO-27 downlink (at 436.800 +/- doppler). It is built with right hand circular polarization, and the gain is supposed to be in the neighborhood of 3 DB.

This project details the construction of a compact, circularly polarized Quadrifilar Helix Antenna (QHA) designed for 146 MHz operation. The antenna features a 1/2λ1/2λ helical design with a 2.6:1 aspect ratio, providing 4.5 dB gain and a spheroid radiation pattern. It is ground plane independent and compatible with both vertical and horizontal polarizations, making it ideal for terrestrial and space communications. The design includes step-by-step instructions for building the antenna using readily available materials like aluminum rods, PVC pipes, and RG-58 coaxial cable. The antenna's performance has been validated through comparisons with commercial omnidirectional antennas, showing superior results.

Showcasing German engineering, ANjo Antennen develops and manufactures a diverse portfolio of amateur radio and commercial antenna products. Their offerings span a wide frequency range from 1.8 MHz to 3000 MHz, emphasizing electrical and mechanical precision for longevity. The company actively participates in events like FUNK.TAG Kassel, providing opportunities for direct engagement and order pickup. ANjo's product line includes high-performance **Yagi antennas** optimized for Tropo and EME, along with multi-stacked Quad antennas designed for contest operations, featuring wide horizontal and narrow vertical beamwidths. They also produce circularly polarized satellite antennas, some with switchable LHCP/RHCP, leveraging their commercial satellite antenna expertise. Beyond amateur applications, ANjo provides flexible, custom antenna solutions for commercial sectors such as BOS, EMC measurements, and telemetry. Their commitment to quality is evident in the Premium-Line antennas, which utilize **1.4301 (V2A) stainless steel** for mast clamps and connectors, ensuring durability and corrosion resistance. They also offer end-fed HF multiband wire antennas, known for their compact footprint and discreet installation.

Chavdar Levkov, LZ1AQ, presents an experimental comparison of small wideband magnetic loops, building on his previous work on wideband active small magnetic loop antennas. His research focuses on increasing loop sensitivity by maximizing the short-circuit current, which is directly tied to the "loop factor" M = A/L, where A is the equivalent loop area and L is its inductance. Levkov's methodology involves reducing inductance and increasing area through parallel or coplanar crossed (CC) configurations, comparing these designs against a reference single quad loop of 1 m2 area. Experimental verification included testing three distinct loop types: a simple quad loop, two coplanar crossed (CC) loops, and eight parallel loops, all designed to have a total geometric area of 1 m2. Measurements were conducted at 1.8, 3.5, 7, and 10 MHz using a small transmitter 270 meters away, with a Perseus direct sampling receiver for precise signal level assessment. The results consistently showed that CC loops, particularly Loop 5 (two CC circular loops with 1.44 m2 total area), yielded significantly higher currents, up to 9.1 dB over the reference loop at 3.5 MHz, validating M as a reliable predictor of loop sensitivity. Numerical simulations using MMANA further corroborated the experimental findings, demonstrating an almost perfect correlation between the calculated M factor and the induced loop current for 15 different loop models. Levkov concludes that CC loops offer superior sensitivity for a given loop area, while parallel loops are advantageous for minimizing physical volume. Practical recommendations suggest using loops with an M factor greater than 0.5 uA/pT for quiet rural environments, and he provides a spreadsheet tool, WLoop_calc.xls, to aid in optimizing loop configurations for specific operational needs.