Search results

GAP produces HF vertical antennas

Comments received from QRP-L members concerning their experiences with GAP antennas.

Analysis of N3UJJ installed antennas using the AIM4170b Antenna Analyzer

Italian ham radio dealer for major brands like Icom Kenwood Yaesu HY-GAIN Heil Sound Rigexpert Palstar GAP antennas Diamond SteppIR and others

This page provides a detailed comparison between the Zero Five and Gap Titan ham radio antennas. The author shares their personal experience with both antennas, highlighting pros and cons for each. They discuss aspects such as ease of assembly, customer service, tuning capabilities, performance on different bands, and the need for grounding and tuning. The comparison aims to help readers make an informed decision on choosing the best antenna for their needs, based on real-world usage scenarios and feedback.

Early 20th-century transatlantic wireless communication efforts involved distinct technical approaches by Reginald Fessenden and Guglielmo Marconi. Marconi's systems, operational until approximately 1912, primarily utilized _spark technology_ for wireless telegraphy, facilitating Morse code communication between ships and across oceans. His Poldhu station in December 1901 radiated signals in the MF band around 850 kHz, later evolving to 272 kHz in October 1902, and eventually 45 kHz by late 1907 with increasingly larger antenna structures like the pyramidal monopole and capacitive top-loaded arrays. Fessenden, conversely, focused on _continuous wave transmission_ for wireless telephony, recognizing its necessity for speech. His transatlantic experiments in 1906 employed synchronous rotary-spark-gap transmitters and 420-foot umbrella top-loaded antennas at Brant Rock, MA, and Machrihanish, Scotland, tuned to approximately 80 kHz. Fessenden later utilized the _Alexanderson HF alternator_ at 75 kHz by late 1906 for pure CW transmission, integrating a carbon microphone for amplitude modulation. Receiver technology also differed, with Marconi initially relying on untuned coherer-type detectors, later developing the magnetic detector in 1902, while Fessenden's CW approach necessitated more advanced detection methods.