Search results

Discover the best low band receive antennas for hams with limited space. Learn about the K9AY loop antenna and Shared Apex Loop Array, two alternatives to the traditional Beverage antenna. Understand the concept of Relative Directivity Factor (RDF) and compare the performance of different receive antennas. See how the Shared Apex Loop, patented by Mark Bauman (KB7GF), offers an RDF between 8 and 10dB. Find out how to optimize antenna performance and enhance your receive capabilities on 160, 80, and 40 meters. Explore the world of low band receive antennas with insights from WB5NHL Ham Radio.

The author describes his experience building and using a Beverage antenna for the 40-meter band. Despite encountering some challenges, the antenna offered some improvements in receiving stations compared to a 3-element inverted Vee antenna. The Beverage antenna showed a significant daytime signal-to-noise ratio improvement and received signals better than the Vee antenna. However, the front-to-back ratio was not ideal, and the transmit power seemed to affect the Beverage antenna. Overall, the author concludes that the Beverage antenna might be more suitable for locations with higher noise levels. The total cost of the antenna was around 30 Euros.

Building some proper matching transformer for loop on ground and Beverage antennas

WB5NHL describes setting up a 160-meter antenna on a small suburban lot, where standard options like Beverage antennas and 1/4 wavelength verticals require extensive space and ground systems. Instead, Guy Olinger's Folded Counterpoise (FCP) provides a solution. The FCP minimizes ground losses by using a folded wire design, allowing effective antenna placement in limited space. The FCP, fed with an isolation transformer, enabled WB5NHL's first 160-meter antenna installation, offering improved performance despite space constraints.

The Beverage on Ground (BOG) antenna offers ham radio operators a compact alternative to traditional Beverage antennas, requiring less space and fewer support structures. This implementation, optimized for 1.8-7 MHz bands, describes ideal parameters: lengths of 60-90 meters, height of 2-10 cm above ground, and specific load resistances based on configuration. The article details experimental methods for determining optimal load resistance and presents matching systems to convert BOG impedance to 50 ohms. While less effective than classic 200-300 meter Beverages, the BOG provides directional reception in limited space, though performance varies with ground conditions and weather changes.

This page provides information about building a Beverage antenna for hams. The article discusses using a 60m wire on the ground to create an effective antenna for amateur radio operators. Learn how to set up and optimize this type of antenna for better reception and communication. This describes a low-noise receiving Beverage antenna setup for low bands, using a N30 cup core transformer for 1:4 impedance matching (likely 50:200 Ohm), RG-58 feedline with heavy common-mode choking, and conduit for wire burial.

The author describes building a remote switch box to control the direction of two reversible Beverage antennas. The switch uses a buried cable and relays to select the desired antenna direction from the shack. The design is simple and uses common components.

Operating on the 60m band requires specialized antennas, and the 2 Element HB9CV, also known as the _ZL special_, excels in this domain. With a gain of **7.3 dBi** when phased at a 162-degree shift, it rivals traditional 3-element Yagi antennas, making it a solid option for enhancing 60m operations. The construction process is thoroughly detailed, providing insights into its performance and practical applications. Real-world comparisons demonstrate that the HB9CV antenna outperforms long Beverage antennas by an average of **5.5 dB** in reception, showcasing its effectiveness in various conditions. Insights from Mr. Cebik's analysis further validate its design, confirming its capability to maximize communication on the 60m band.

The author struggled with receiving antennas on his property. After a standard Beverage on Ground (BOG) antenna failed, he built a Reverse Beverage on Ground (RBOG) using telephone cable. He details construction and testing, finding the RBOG outperformed other antennas in noise level, signal strength, and reception pattern. Software modeling helped optimize the antenna length. Unfortunately, the project ended when telephone cable from the second RBOG was stolen.

This article explores Beverage antennas, a type used for low-frequency radio reception. Despite the mystique, they are relatively simple wire antennas placed near the ground. Their key benefit is improved signal-to-noise ratio by rejecting unwanted signals. While lengthier antennas offer better reception, even shorter versions (around 200 feet) can improve DX reception compared to traditional antennas.

This FAQ covers building and buying transformers for loop-on-ground and Beverage antennas. Building one uses ferrite cores and thin wire. Buying is an option, with the DX Engineering BFS-1 being recommended. These transformers isolate the antenna from the cable to prevent unwanted signal pickup.

This resource presents a non-rigorous evaluation of the front-to-back (F/B) ratio of short Beverage antennas, specifically designed for low-band operation on frequencies such as 160, 80, 40, and 30 meters. The author, VE1ZAC, details the methodology used to measure the F/B ratio, which involves using a Millen Grid Dip Oscillator as a portable signal source. Measurements were taken by switching the antenna direction and recording S Meter and preamp readings to derive gain numbers. The document discusses the challenges faced in achieving accurate measurements and the assumptions made during the process, such as the calibration of S Meter units at 6 dB. This evaluation is particularly relevant for amateur radio operators interested in antenna performance on low bands.

Details the construction and performance of a phase-controlled receiving array, specifically a **MicroSWA** variant, optimized for QRP low band fox hunting on 40M and 80M. The resource documents the author's iterative design process, addressing significant regional noise challenges encountered during 0100-0230 UTC fox hunt periods. Initial experiments involved a director wire on a 40M vertical, yielding limited improvement, prompting a shift towards advanced null-steering techniques. The project leverages concepts from Victor Misek’s "The Beverage Antenna Handbook" and Dallas Lankford’s extensive work on phased receiving antennas for urban lots. A key modification involved integrating a new passive phase control box and a push-pull **Norton common base preamp** using 2N5109 transistors, designed for high third-order intercept performance to maintain weak signal integrity amidst strong adjacent signals. The system incorporates Faraday-shielded transformers with RG174 primaries on -75 ferrite cores, housed in ABS plastic pipe. Performance tests confirmed the MicroSWA's ability to produce deep, steerable nulls, achieving approximately 30 dB noise reduction on 160M, 80M, and 40M. This enabled detection of QRP signals undetectable on conventional transmit antennas. The final unit includes front panel controls, a 10-11 dB preamp, and a robust power conditioner, demonstrating effective noise mitigation for challenging low band QRP operations.

The article describes adding lightning protection to Beverage antennas, which are long wires susceptible to lightning strikes. The author reviews common lightning protection circuits and discusses their components. They then detail their design based on existing methods, highlighting choices for components and reasoning behind them. Finally, the author presents the completed design and its implementation on their Beverage antennas.

This article discusses the Beverage antenna, a reception antenna for low bands, originally published in the Megahertz magazine between November 1990 and April 1991. It explains the challenges faced in receiving signals on low bands due to interference and how the Beverage antenna's directional radiation pattern can help improve reception of distant stations. The article highlights the importance of choosing antennas with low efficiency but sharp radiation lobes for better DX signal reception. It also compares the reception characteristics of signals from European stations versus DX stations, emphasizing the benefits of antennas favoring low arrival angles for DX signals on low bands.