Search results

The HB9ABX RoomCap antenna document details the construction and performance characteristics of a compact HF antenna design. It presents a series of comparative field tests conducted between July and September 2005, evaluating the HB9ABX antenna against established designs like the Microvert MV-500, Cushcraft R5/R7000 verticals, and a 5-element DJ2UT Yagi beam. Specific test scenarios include mobile installations, rooftop deployments, and comparisons on 20m, 40m, 80m, and 160m bands, with signal reports from various European and DX stations. The resource emphasizes the antenna's small physical footprint and its claimed efficiency across multiple HF bands. Test results consistently show the HB9ABX antenna performing comparably to, and often outperforming, larger reference antennas in terms of received signal strength, with reported differences of 1 to 2 S-points (6-12 dB) in many contacts. Notably, a 20m DX test on July 26, 2005, indicated the 1.3m HB9ABX radiator yielded 2-3 S-points stronger signals than an R7000 vertical for US DX stations. An August 12, 2005, test on 40m highlighted the HB9ABX's superior signal-to-noise ratio in urban QRM, demonstrating 10-18 dB better performance than an R7000. The document includes specific callsigns, signal reports, and QTHs for each comparison, providing empirical data for the antenna's performance claims.

Multi Band Quad,Cushcraft R5, R7, R7000, repair and maintenance, Remote Antenna Switching, Hexagonal Beam, Automatic Band Decoder, Low Band Verticals, Crank-up Tiltover Tower etc

Maintenance and repair of a Cushcraft R5 vertical antenna

Cushcraft R5.pdf

This article refers mainly to the old Cushcraft 1/4 wavelength AV series of antennas (12AVQ, 14AVQ etc) hence the references to radials. The R series (R5, R7 etc) are 1/2 wavelength antennas, and the radials are NOT 1/4 wavelength resonant.

eham users review of the Cushcraft r5 vertical antenna

Temporary hf vertical installation for testing