Search results

A course on fractals antennas theory provided by La Ecole nationale superieure de techniques avancees in France. Course is in French.

This document provides comprehensive guidance on modeling and constructing multiband dipole antennas using traps. It addresses common segmentation issues in EZNEC modeling software, recommends optimal segment lengths for trap models, and compares trapped dipoles with paralleled multiband dipoles. While trap dipoles are significantly shorter, they exhibit lower gain and narrower bandwidth. Detailed instructions for building weatherproof coaxial traps include material lists, construction steps, and tuning methods. The guide notes that properly constructed coaxial traps introduce only minimal signal loss (0.6 dB) while offering practical multiband performance in a compact design.

Chavdar Levkov, LZ1AQ, presents an experimental comparison of small wideband magnetic loops, building on his previous work on wideband active small magnetic loop antennas. His research focuses on increasing loop sensitivity by maximizing the short-circuit current, which is directly tied to the "loop factor" M = A/L, where A is the equivalent loop area and L is its inductance. Levkov's methodology involves reducing inductance and increasing area through parallel or coplanar crossed (CC) configurations, comparing these designs against a reference single quad loop of 1 m2 area. Experimental verification included testing three distinct loop types: a simple quad loop, two coplanar crossed (CC) loops, and eight parallel loops, all designed to have a total geometric area of 1 m2. Measurements were conducted at 1.8, 3.5, 7, and 10 MHz using a small transmitter 270 meters away, with a Perseus direct sampling receiver for precise signal level assessment. The results consistently showed that CC loops, particularly Loop 5 (two CC circular loops with 1.44 m2 total area), yielded significantly higher currents, up to 9.1 dB over the reference loop at 3.5 MHz, validating M as a reliable predictor of loop sensitivity. Numerical simulations using MMANA further corroborated the experimental findings, demonstrating an almost perfect correlation between the calculated M factor and the induced loop current for 15 different loop models. Levkov concludes that CC loops offer superior sensitivity for a given loop area, while parallel loops are advantageous for minimizing physical volume. Practical recommendations suggest using loops with an M factor greater than 0.5 uA/pT for quiet rural environments, and he provides a spreadsheet tool, WLoop_calc.xls, to aid in optimizing loop configurations for specific operational needs.

Rob Conklin N4WGY delivered an informative presentation on Hexagonal Beam antennas (Hex Beams), detailing their construction, performance, and benefits over traditional multiband Yagi antennas. He highlighted their cost-effectiveness, lower wind loading, lightweight design, and multi-band capabilities without requiring traps. Conklin also discussed the improved G3TXQ design, which offers better SWR performance across ham bands. The presentation included practical construction tips, resource recommendations, and demonstrations of performance analysis tools, making it a valuable resource for both novice and experienced antenna builders.

Integrating a _Software Defined Radio_ (SDR) into an existing ham radio setup involves connecting it with a standard transceiver (TRX), power amplifier (PA), and antennas. The core component is a splitter box that facilitates the connection between the TRX and the SDR, allowing for simultaneous operation without modifying existing equipment. In receive mode, the splitter ties the antenna inputs of both the TRX and a direct conversion receiver (DC RX) together. During transmission, the DC RX input is grounded via a fast telecom relay controlled by the transceiver's -SEND signal, incorporating a 10ms delay for safety. The splitter box includes a 3.7 dB input attenuator for impedance matching and acts as a protective fuse for the DC RX input. Ground loops are mitigated using common mode balun transformers, while the DC RX input is insulated with a broadband transformer. An audio switch box complements the setup, enabling users to listen to either the main transceiver, the SDR output, or both simultaneously. This configuration ensures noise immunity and safety, with the splitter housed in a screened box made from PCB material. On-air tests, such as the CQ WW 160m CW DX Contest, demonstrate the system's effectiveness, showcasing the SDR's ability to handle crowded band conditions with superior selectivity and dynamic range. The SDR's narrow bandwidth filters and waterfall display provide significant advantages, allowing operators to detect weak signals amidst strong interference. The integration of SDR with conventional radios offers enhanced operational flexibility and performance in challenging environments.

The Acom 1500 HF+6M Linear Amplifier is a high-quality and user-friendly amplifier that provides excellent performance and reliability. G6NHU, who previously owned an Acom 1000, upgraded to the Acom 1500 after nine years and has been using it for about eighteen months. Key features highlighted include the ability to connect three antennas internally, straightforward tuning process, robust construction that can handle high SWR, quiet operation, fast and quiet switching for efficient CW operation, and clean output signal even when driven hard. G6NHU highly recommends the Acom 1500 and states they would not hesitate to purchase another one in the future.

The author struggled with receiving antennas on his property. After a standard Beverage on Ground (BOG) antenna failed, he built a Reverse Beverage on Ground (RBOG) using telephone cable. He details construction and testing, finding the RBOG outperformed other antennas in noise level, signal strength, and reception pattern. Software modeling helped optimize the antenna length. Unfortunately, the project ended when telephone cable from the second RBOG was stolen.

This FAQ covers building and buying transformers for loop-on-ground and Beverage antennas. Building one uses ferrite cores and thin wire. Buying is an option, with the DX Engineering BFS-1 being recommended. These transformers isolate the antenna from the cable to prevent unwanted signal pickup.

This resource presents a non-rigorous evaluation of the front-to-back (F/B) ratio of short Beverage antennas, specifically designed for low-band operation on frequencies such as 160, 80, 40, and 30 meters. The author, VE1ZAC, details the methodology used to measure the F/B ratio, which involves using a Millen Grid Dip Oscillator as a portable signal source. Measurements were taken by switching the antenna direction and recording S Meter and preamp readings to derive gain numbers. The document discusses the challenges faced in achieving accurate measurements and the assumptions made during the process, such as the calibration of S Meter units at 6 dB. This evaluation is particularly relevant for amateur radio operators interested in antenna performance on low bands.

Early 20th-century transatlantic wireless communication efforts involved distinct technical approaches by Reginald Fessenden and Guglielmo Marconi. Marconi's systems, operational until approximately 1912, primarily utilized _spark technology_ for wireless telegraphy, facilitating Morse code communication between ships and across oceans. His Poldhu station in December 1901 radiated signals in the MF band around 850 kHz, later evolving to 272 kHz in October 1902, and eventually 45 kHz by late 1907 with increasingly larger antenna structures like the pyramidal monopole and capacitive top-loaded arrays. Fessenden, conversely, focused on _continuous wave transmission_ for wireless telephony, recognizing its necessity for speech. His transatlantic experiments in 1906 employed synchronous rotary-spark-gap transmitters and 420-foot umbrella top-loaded antennas at Brant Rock, MA, and Machrihanish, Scotland, tuned to approximately 80 kHz. Fessenden later utilized the _Alexanderson HF alternator_ at 75 kHz by late 1906 for pure CW transmission, integrating a carbon microphone for amplitude modulation. Receiver technology also differed, with Marconi initially relying on untuned coherer-type detectors, later developing the magnetic detector in 1902, while Fessenden's CW approach necessitated more advanced detection methods.