Search results

Demonstrates the construction of a **multi-band HF mobile antenna** utilizing a modified CB whip antenna base. The resource details the process of stripping a commercial CB whip, winding a new helical coil with 0.7mm insulated copper wire, and identifying tapping points for various HF bands. It emphasizes the importance of a rugged, slim design for mobile operation, discussing mechanical length, power handling (up to 200 watts), and coil diameter considerations. The article includes a graphic illustrating the antenna's operational principle, where sections of the helical coil are shorted from bottom to top to maintain efficiency and high Q. The resource presents a practical approach to achieving **band switching** without an external tuner, by manually adjusting tapping points on the coil. It provides a table with reference lengths in centimeters from the feedpoint for 7 MHz (40m) through 28.7 MHz (10m), including WARC bands. The author details mounting techniques, suggesting a Diamond bracket for secure attachment to a vehicle trunk, and stresses the critical role of proper grounding for optimal performance. The design allows for operation on 75m and 80m bands by adding a 110mm steel whip.

Build your mobile antenna which outperforms Hustler by 10db and ATAS-100 by 18db. From 80 to 10m. The HB9ABX mobile HF antenna, designed for 10 to 80 meters, was developed by Felix Meyer and outperforms commercial antennas like HUSTLER and YAESU ATAS-100/120 in field tests. Made from fiberglass rods and enamelled copper wire, it includes a loading coil with adjustable taps for tuning across bands. Installation requires solid grounding, and adjustments are made via whip length and coil settings. An antenna tuner ensures optimal SWR. Users must handle fiberglass with care due to health risks. This design proved highly effective in South America and Europe.

The RXO Unitenna, a vertical wideband antenna, offers operation across the 7-21 MHz spectrum, covering the 40, 30, 20, 17, and 15-meter amateur bands. This design focuses on achieving a low SWR across a broad frequency range, making it suitable for general HF operation without requiring an external antenna tuner for minor SWR variations. The antenna utilizes a unique loading coil and matching network to maintain efficient radiation characteristics across its operational bandwidth. Construction details within the PDF document include specific dimensions for the radiating element and the counterpoise system, which is critical for vertical antenna performance. The design incorporates readily available materials, simplifying the build process for radio amateurs. Performance graphs illustrate the SWR characteristics across the 7 MHz to 21 MHz range, demonstrating the antenna's wideband capabilities. The document also provides guidance on feedline connection and grounding considerations for optimal field deployment. This vertical antenna configuration is particularly useful for hams with limited space, offering a compact footprint compared to horizontal wire antennas.

The Inverted L antenna is a versatile and efficient design suitable for small gardens, allowing amateur radio operators to operate on multiple bands. This project outlines the construction of a 5-band inverted L antenna, which can cover HF bands effectively. The design is particularly advantageous for those with limited space, as it requires minimal ground space while providing good performance. The antenna can be easily constructed using common materials, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced hams. In this guide, GM0ONX shares detailed instructions on how to build the inverted L antenna, including dimensions and tuning tips. The project emphasizes the importance of proper installation and grounding to ensure optimal performance. Additionally, it discusses the antenna's compatibility with various transceivers and the potential for portable operation. This resource is ideal for hams looking to enhance their station with a multiband antenna that performs well in limited space.

The 6 Band Inverted L Antenna MK3 is a versatile multiband antenna designed for amateur radio operators. This antenna covers 160m, 80m, 40m, 20m, 15m, and 10m bands, making it suitable for a wide range of HF communications. The design is based on a W3DZZ configuration, incorporating traps for optimal performance. The MK3 version features a sturdy 5/8th CB mast, replacing the original timber mast, which enhances durability against harsh weather conditions. The antenna's construction allows for effective operation, particularly on the 40m band, where it has been successfully used to contact distant locations including ZL, VK, and Antarctica. Constructing this antenna requires careful attention to detail, especially regarding the radials and grounding. The traps resonate at specific frequencies, and additional resources are available for building coaxial traps. The antenna is designed to work efficiently without an ATU on the lower bands, while higher bands may require tuning. This project is ideal for both beginner and intermediate operators looking to enhance their station with a reliable multiband antenna.

Ham Radio Tower Project at N0HR. Includes site plan, escavation, tower construction, HF antennas, grounding and lightning protection, coax and more.

Protecting amateur radio equipment from transient overvoltages requires robust lightning and surge protection, which is the focus of Electronic Specialty Products. The company provides various devices, including coaxial lightning arrestors for antenna feedlines and surge protectors for AC power lines and data circuits. These devices are engineered to divert high-energy surges, such as those caused by direct or indirect lightning strikes, away from sensitive transceivers, amplifiers, and computer components, thereby preventing catastrophic damage. Key products include the _Coaxial Lightning Protector_ series, designed for various impedance levels and frequency ranges up to 3 GHz, and the _AC Line Surge Protector_ for shack power distribution. Effective deployment of these protection devices can significantly reduce the risk of equipment failure and ensure operational continuity during severe weather. For instance, a properly installed coaxial arrestor can handle peak currents of **20 kA**, while AC line protectors offer clamping voltages typically below 400V. Comparing different models reveals varying levels of insertion loss and return loss, with some coaxial units exhibiting less than 0.1 dB loss at 500 MHz, making them suitable for high-performance HF and VHF/UHF operations. Integrating these components into a comprehensive grounding system is crucial for achieving maximum protection against both common-mode and differential-mode surges.

The _Sci.Electronics FAQ: Repair: RFI/EMI Info_ document, authored by Daniel 9V1ZV, provides a detailed analysis of computer-generated RFI/EMI, focusing on its impact on radio reception. It identifies common RFI sources such as CPU clock rates (e.g., 4.77 MHz to 80 MHz), video card oscillators (e.g., 14.316 MHz), and even keyboard microprocessors, all of which generate square-wave harmonics across HF and L-VHF regions. The resource outlines a systematic procedure for pinpointing RFI origins, including disconnecting peripherals and using a portable AM/SW receiver with a ferrite rod antenna to localize strong interference sources. The document categorizes RFI mitigation into shielding, filtering, and design problems, offering practical solutions for each. It recommends applying conductive sprays like _EMI-LAC_ or _EMV-LACK_ to plastic casings of radios, monitors, and CPUs to create effective Faraday cages, emphasizing proper grounding and avoiding short circuits. For filtering, the guide suggests using line filters, ferrite beads, and toroids on power and data lines, and small value capacitors (e.g., 0.01 uF for serial/parallel, 100 pF for video) to shunt RFI to ground. It also discusses the use of bandpass, high-pass, low-pass, and notch filters on the receiver front-end or antenna feed to combat specific in-band noise.

Discovering a solution for limited space, the inverted L HF antenna emerges as a stellar performer. Half the size of a dipole, it ensures optimal installation in restricted areas, maintaining superb transmission (TX) and reception (RX) characteristics. Spectrum Communications' multi-band version, featuring traps, proves even more space-friendly without compromising performance. A fiberglass pole offers sturdy support, while proper grounding, an RF choke, and occasional tuning contribute to a high-performing and reliable antenna system.

The _G3TSO_ Mobile Antenna Page details construction and tuning methods for mobile antennas operating across **10 to 160 metres**. The content describes a Hustler-based design, optimized for RF performance and vehicle speeds, featuring centre loading. For optimal operation on various bands, the loading coil placement requires clearance from the vehicle body. Antenna resonance is critical for efficient mobile operation. A mobile antenna's base impedance may be as low as 27 ohms, requiring specific matching to achieve maximum radiation, as a minimum SWR at the transmitter does not always indicate resonance or maximum output. Tuning involves physical adjustment of antenna length to achieve resonance at the operating frequency. The _G3TSO_ page outlines a tuning procedure utilizing a low-power signal source and a field strength meter to identify maximum radiation before impedance matching. Loading coil placement, either at the base, center, or top of the antenna, influences radiation efficiency and mechanical stability for mobile installations. Centre-loaded whips, such as the Hustler design, offer a compromise between efficiency and stability, often for single-band operation. Helically wound antennas, including those for **28 MHz**, may present base impedances around 17 ohms, resulting in a 3:1 SWR at resonance. Low resistance grounding at the antenna base is also specified for optimizing performance and minimizing RFI during mobile operation. DXZone Focus: Mobile | Any | Antenna Tuning | HF

Illustrates the potential for radio frequency (RF) energy from amateur transceivers to interfere with vehicle electronics, drawing parallels to military _Radio Frequency Vehicle Stopper_ (RFVS) technology. The resource details personal experiences with VHF/UHF signals activating household devices and then pivots to the complexities of RF interaction with automotive systems, noting the development of multi-frequency RFVS (MFRFVS) to overcome vehicle-specific vulnerabilities. It highlights that while car manufacturers conduct RF immunity tests, the rigor varies, with luxury brands likely performing more extensive evaluations than others who merely meet minimal certification. The article explores practical considerations for mobile amateur radio installations, suggesting antenna placement over the car, using lower power output, and proper grounding to mitigate adverse effects. It acknowledges the lack of comprehensive data on RF/vehicle combinations but emphasizes that adherence to these basic principles can reduce risks. The author shares observations of unexplained car computer codes in a 2002 SUV, speculating on potential RF induction. Concerns are raised about the increasing complexity and interconnectedness of modern car electronics, including Bluetooth, remote access, and electronic control systems for critical functions like steering and braking. The article points out the diminishing space for third-party installations in contemporary vehicles and references the ARRL's stance on auto manufacturer policies regarding amateur radio installations, which generally advise against them.