Search results

The J-Pole antenna is an omnidirectional antenna that can be used for base, mobile and field day stations. It does not need a ground plane, radials or a complicated matching system. The J-Pole can be cheaply, simply and quickly constructed using a variety of techniques, some of which are discussed in this article.

Details the construction and optimization of antenna systems for amateur radio satellite operations, focusing on practical, homebrew solutions for VHF/UHF bands. It covers building _groundplane antennas_ from salvaged materials, recycling old beam antennas into new configurations like a 2-meter crossed yagi, and constructing a 10-meter horizontal delta loop. The resource also explains antenna matching techniques, including folded dipole driven elements and quarter-wave transformers, along with the importance of accurate SWR measurements and minimizing coax loss. Demonstrates how to achieve a **1:1 SWR** by carefully trimming elements and adjusting radial angles on groundplane antennas. It provides insights into selecting appropriate coax and connectors, highlighting the benefits of Belden 9913 for low loss and the proper installation of _N-connectors_. The article also addresses RFI mitigation from computer birdies and presents a design for a silent triac antenna control circuit, offering practical solutions for common satellite station challenges.

Notes on homebrewing antennas by Chris G4CYA, from gamma matching, to phasing antennas, splitters and combiners, baluns and measuring techniques.

About the clemens match for beam antenna, as an alternative to common gamma matching techniques

The article, "Using 75 Ohm CATV Coaxial Cable," details methods for employing readily available 75-ohm CATV hardline in standard 50-ohm amateur radio setups. It addresses the inherent impedance mismatch and practical considerations, such as connector compatibility, for hams seeking cost-effective, low-loss feedline solutions. The resource specifically contrasts common 50-ohm cables like RG-8, RG213, and _LMR-400_ with 75-ohm hardline, highlighting the latter's lower loss characteristics, particularly at VHF and UHF frequencies. It explores two primary approaches to manage the impedance difference: direct connection with an acceptable SWR compromise and precise impedance transformation. The direct connection method acknowledges that a perfect 1:1 SWR is not always critical, especially when using low-loss coax. For impedance transformation, the article explains the use of half-wavelength sections of coax to reflect the antenna's 50-ohm impedance back to the transmitter, noting its single-frequency effectiveness. It also briefly mentions transformer designs using toroid cores and a technique involving two 1/12 wavelength sections of feedline for broader bandwidth. The content further clarifies the concept of _velocity factor_ for calculating electrical versus physical cable lengths, providing a generic formula for precise length determination. It notes that while half-wave matching is practical for 10 meters and above, it can result in excessively long runs for lower bands like 160 meters, potentially adding **250 feet** of cable. The article also mentions achieving a usable bandwidth of 28.000 MHz up to at least **28.8 MHz** on 10 meters with specific transformation techniques.

Demonstrates the complete design and development process for a **Low Noise Microwave Amplifier** (LNA), beginning with conceptual design and progressing through prototyping. The tutorial series covers the initial stages of a single-ended first gain stage, focusing on critical parameters such as noise figure, gain, and stability. It systematically details the theoretical underpinnings and practical considerations for achieving optimal performance in microwave frequency applications. This resource provides a structured approach to LNA construction, enabling radio amateurs and RF engineers to understand the iterative steps involved in realizing high-performance receive-side amplification. It offers insights into component selection, impedance matching networks, and the measurement techniques required to validate design specifications, particularly for **microwave** band operation where noise performance is paramount.

A dipole can be broadbanded by a number of techniques including by matching with resonant sections of transmission feed lines.

The _G3TSO_ Mobile Antenna Page details construction and tuning methods for mobile antennas operating across **10 to 160 metres**. The content describes a Hustler-based design, optimized for RF performance and vehicle speeds, featuring centre loading. For optimal operation on various bands, the loading coil placement requires clearance from the vehicle body. Antenna resonance is critical for efficient mobile operation. A mobile antenna's base impedance may be as low as 27 ohms, requiring specific matching to achieve maximum radiation, as a minimum SWR at the transmitter does not always indicate resonance or maximum output. Tuning involves physical adjustment of antenna length to achieve resonance at the operating frequency. The _G3TSO_ page outlines a tuning procedure utilizing a low-power signal source and a field strength meter to identify maximum radiation before impedance matching. Loading coil placement, either at the base, center, or top of the antenna, influences radiation efficiency and mechanical stability for mobile installations. Centre-loaded whips, such as the Hustler design, offer a compromise between efficiency and stability, often for single-band operation. Helically wound antennas, including those for **28 MHz**, may present base impedances around 17 ohms, resulting in a 3:1 SWR at resonance. Low resistance grounding at the antenna base is also specified for optimizing performance and minimizing RFI during mobile operation. DXZone Focus: Mobile | Any | Antenna Tuning | HF

This comprehensive article dispels common misconceptions about Standing Wave Ratio (SWR) in amateur radio. The author explains that SWR is not an antenna property but a measure of the entire antenna system, representing the mismatch between transmission line and load impedance. Contrary to popular belief, modest SWR values (under 3:1) typically cause minimal power loss in HF applications. The article demonstrates mathematically why obsession with achieving 1:1 SWR is often unnecessary, explains when SWR matters more (QRO, QRP, VHF/UHF), and explores effective matching techniques including proper ATU placement and quarter-wavelength transformers.