Search results

DJ9RB details several antenna projects, including loaded dipoles and verticals specifically for the 160m, 80m, and 40m amateur radio bands. Featured designs include a 160m loaded dipole with end capacitance, a 160m loaded L-antenna, and a 160m kite-supported vertical. For 80m, the resource describes a short broadband dipole (80BBDP), an 8m high top-loaded vertical (TLV80) with elevated radials, and a shielded loop for 3.5 MHz. For the 40m band, a 7m high top-loaded vertical (TLV40) and a 6m high portable top-loaded GP (TLV40mesh) are presented, both optimized for 7 MHz. Additional dipole designs cover 40m, 30m, 20m, 17m, and 6m bands, utilizing coaxial cable traps. The page also mentions specific vertical antenna variants like the TLV20 (GP14MHz) with two radials and the TLV30HWL-10MHz, a loaded half-wavelength vertical. The content includes information on high-power homemade components, such as a 3.5 MHz AM transmitter from 1964 and a 14 MHz portable transceiver from 1977. It also touches upon measurement instruments, BNC connector assembly, and QTH details from DJ9RB's operations, including H44/DJ9RB from the Solomon Islands.

The Bruce array is a simple, often-forgotten wire antenna array that is advantageous for 80 and 160 meters, where typical gain antennas are very large. This bi-directional broadside vertical array is only 1\4 lambda high and does not require a ground system. It offers substantially greater SWR bandwidth than the half-square or bobtail curtain. A 4-element Bruce array used by N6LF showed a gain of about 4.6 dB compared to a 1\4 lambda vertical with 8 elevated radials, with a 2:1 SWR bandwidth greater than 400 kHz. The antenna is simple and its dimensions are flexible.

The basic antenna is a vertical monopole, using elevated radials to complete the ground plane by k5oe

A 3.5 Mhz top loaded vertical antenna built using 2 elevated radials by DJ9RB

Radial systems for elevated and ground mounted vertical antennas by SteppIR

This resource details the conversion of an 80m elevated vertical antenna to include 160m operation, focusing on a relay-switched design over a trap-based approach. It presents specific feedpoint impedance values, such as **32 ohms** for 80m and **14 ohms** for 160m, and discusses the challenges of SWR drift encountered with the prior trap system during RTTY contesting. The article thoroughly explains the design choices for elevated radials, referencing _N6LF QEX data_ to debunk common myths regarding radial length and height, demonstrating that non-resonant radials can offer superior current uniformity. The construction section provides practical insights into building the vertical, including guying strategies, material selection from scrap pipe, and weatherproofing the relay assembly. It highlights the use of a common mode choke for the relay switching line, measuring approximately 5K ohms on both 160m and 80m, and details the L/C matching network's role in achieving a 50-ohm match at the end of a 300-foot RG-11 run. The author describes a precise VNA-based radial trimming procedure, achieving resonant values within a 3 KHz range. The content emphasizes the practical application of theoretical antenna principles, particularly concerning the interaction between the vertical element, cap hats, and the matching network. It offers a candid assessment of component selection, such as using junkbox parts and acknowledging the need for future upgrades to static drain resistors. The article serves as a comprehensive case study for advanced antenna builders tackling multi-band vertical designs.

Demonstrates the construction and implementation of a **two-element phased vertical array** for 40 meters, utilizing _Christman phasing_ techniques. The author, W4NFR, details the process from building individual 1/4-wave aluminum verticals to integrating them into a phased system. The resource covers antenna spacing of 32 feet, elevated radial design, and the critical steps for tuning each vertical to achieve a 1.1:1 SWR before combining them. It also provides insights into calculating precise coax lengths for feedlines and the phasing delay line, emphasizing the use of an MFJ-269 Antenna Analyzer for verification. The finished system exhibits good front-to-back nulls, with an overall SWR ranging from 1.6:1 to 2.2:1, which is managed by an antenna tuner. The project includes detailed photos of the relay box, showing 12 VDC relays capable of handling 5KV, and the control box in the shack for switching between three different antenna pattern configurations. Static bleed-off chokes are incorporated for protection, and the construction emphasizes robust weatherproofing for outdoor elements.

Guide to ground mounting antennas, notes on efficiency, elevated installations, metal towers and masts, other mounting schemas, moble homes and rv, lightning protections, artiche by Bencher

Ten essential tips and truisms for understanding HF antenna: Non-resonant wire dipole antennas fed with open-wire line and an antenna tuner can function effectively as multiband antennas, as detailed in "The Classic Multiband Dipole Antenna" by WB8IMY in March 2004 QST. Coaxial cable, unlike balanced parallel-wire feed lines, can cause RF to travel on the outer shield braid, leading to RF feedback to the station; a 1:1 balun at the dipole center can mitigate this by isolating the unbalanced coaxial feed line. Antenna gain is achieved by shaping and directing RF energy, with beam antennas concentrating power in a specific direction, and wire antennas also exhibiting shaped radiation patterns. An antenna tuner's primary role is to match the transceiver's 50-ohm output to the antenna system's impedance, allowing modern transceivers to deliver full power. Wire antennas do not always require center feeding; end-fed long wires or off-center-fed dipoles (like the Windom) can be used, though they often necessitate an antenna tuner and a counterpoise or radial network. Dipole antennas do not need to be perfectly horizontal; their legs can be bent or inclined, which affects feed point impedance and may require SWR experimentation with coaxial feed. Vertical antennas shorter than a half wavelength require an efficient ground system, typically comprising elevated or buried radial wires, with more radials generally leading to better efficiency. A 1:1 SWR indicates an impedance match but does not guarantee antenna efficiency; an inefficient vertical antenna with a poor ground system can show a low SWR while wasting most RF as heat. Investing in high-quality, low-loss feed line, especially coaxial cable, is crucial for maximizing RF signal transfer and overall antenna system performance.

A 17 3/4-inch radiating element and 18 3/4-inch ground plane radials form the basis of this quarter-wave ground plane antenna for 2 meters FM. The design, attributed to AA1PG, utilizes a panel-mount SO-239 UHF connector and three lengths of #12 copper wire, with a total material cost estimated at $3.00. Construction involves soldering the elements directly to the SO-239, emphasizing thorough solder flow for robust connections. Recommended feedline includes _RG-8X_ for longer runs, with _RG-58_ acceptable for shorter lengths, cautioning against _RG-174_ for VHF applications due to high loss. The antenna is designed for elevated deployment, such as in trees or on roof gables, to maximize line-of-sight propagation. It aims to improve repeater access compared to typical rubber duck antennas, even with low power output.

A multiband vertical antenna for HF bands with elevated ground radials slant down at 45 degrees and acting also as guy wires.

The Superantennas MP-1 portable HF antenna is analyzed for its design and field performance, particularly its high-Q loading coil and 3/8-inch mounting. The review details the antenna's construction, including an 8-inch vertical section, a large-diameter loading coil tuned by a sleeve, and a 4-foot whip that disassembles into six rods for transport. Initial testing with the supplied 10-foot ribbon cable "ground plane" yielded poor SWR and RF hot conditions, indicating an inadequate ground system. Further experimentation with longer radials and resonant counterpoises for each band improved matching and eliminated RF hot issues, but introduced significant operational complexity. The author notes the difficulty in optimizing both counterpoise length and coil setting without an antenna analyzer, and the sensitivity of the MP-1 to counterpoise deployment. The review also discusses the recommendation to tune for maximum received signals rather than minimum SWR, often necessitating an external ATU due to the antenna's typical low impedance. The **MP-1**'s critical dependence on resonant counterpoises for effective operation, especially when elevated, is highlighted as a major drawback for portable use. The author ultimately sold the antenna, concluding that despite its sound technical design, its fussy nature and the need for extensive counterpoise management or an ATU detract from its portability and convenience compared to simpler, less expensive dipole solutions. The **Superantennas MP-1** is deemed a flawed portable antenna, requiring considerable effort to achieve its claimed performance.

A helically wound vertical antenna experiment. 14 meter of wire wounded on a 8 meter fishing pole with 4 elevated radials

Steve Nichols, G0KYA, presents a practical examination of ground systems for vertical antennas, drawing heavily on the empirical research of Rudy Severns, N6LF. He explains that a robust radial field is crucial for ground-dependent verticals, effectively replacing the antenna's "missing half" and mitigating severe RF absorption in lossy soil. Nichols clarifies that surface radials do not strictly require a quarter-wavelength; instead, deploying a minimum of 16 to 32 shorter wires often yields superior results compared to fewer, longer ones. The presentation also addresses the common SWR paradox: a poor ground might show a perfect 1:1 match, but adding radials, while potentially raising the SWR to around 1.4:1, significantly improves true radiation efficiency. Nichols defines counterpoises as elevated wire networks that substitute for earth connections, offering solutions for limited-space installations, such as the **Folded Counterpoise (FCP)** for 160 meters. This resource provides actionable engineering data for optimizing vertical antenna performance.

Learn about the POTA PERformer antenna, a portable, elevated, resonant whip designed by Greg Mihran KJ6ER. Discover how this unique antenna requires fewer radials to be efficient, making it ideal for portable operations. Explore the benefits of using two radials for a directional radiating pattern, compared to just one radial. Find out how computer modeling can help optimize the performance of the POTA PERformer antenna for your ham radio activities.

The article by Guy Olinger, K2AV, published in the May/June 2012 National Contest Journal, introduces the Folded Counterpoise (FCP), a compact 516-foot single-wire counterpoise elevated at 8 feet, designed for 160-meter operations on small lots like 100x150-foot backyards. Originating from efforts to revive Top Band for W0UCE on a postage-stamp property, the FCP uses strategic folds to cancel ground fields within 33 feet of center, minimizing losses to 0.13-0.53 dB—outperforming sparse or on-ground radials by up to 15 dB in poor soil—while mimicking opposed radials for efficient feedpoint impedance. Paired with a critical 1:1 or 4:1 isolation transformer (e.g., trifilar on T300-2 toroid) to block common-mode currents on coax feeds, it delivers proven results: K2AV's #8 North America low-power contest score, 7+ dB gains at W4KAZ and K5AF, and over 10,000 global web hits for DIY instructions using bare 12 AWG wire and weatherproof enclosures. Ideal for acreage-challenged hams, the FCP also excels on 80 meters with scaled dimensions, offering a low-loss alternative where full radials are impractical

VE1ZAC's analysis details the performance of **MFJ927** and **SGC239** autotuners with portable HF vertical antennas, specifically comparing 31 ft and 43 ft configurations. The resource originated from challenges encountered during a Maritime QSO Party roving operation, necessitating a lightweight and easily deployable antenna system. Target bands for the contest included 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 meters, with a maximum power handling of 100 W CW. The author utilized a 30-foot carbon fiber push-up pole to support a vertical wire element, noting its 2 lb weight and reliability. EZNEC modeling was employed to predict performance, showing favorable results for a 30-foot vertical with elevated radials, particularly on 40 and 20 meters. Feedpoint impedance measurements, taken with an AIM4170C, are presented for various HF bands, both with and without a 41-foot RG6 stub designed to reduce reactance on 80 and 20 meters. The stub significantly improved matching on these bands, easing the tuner's workload. Operational tests revealed issues with the MFJ927's reliability during contest setup, leading to reliance on the K3's internal tuner. The SGC239, tested post-contest, performed flawlessly. A detailed side-by-side comparison covers mechanical aspects, connection options, power bias, impedance range, board quality, and documentation. Modifications to the MFJ927, including a new aluminum case, white paint for heat reduction, and upgraded impedance-measuring resistors, are also described.

DF6QV's 4-Square antenna analysis begins with a two-element array simulation, demonstrating azimuth and elevation plots for various phase differences, including a 75-135 degree range. The document then delves into the core components of a 4-Square system, such as radiators, couplers, phasing lines, and ground systems, referencing W1HKK's 1965 QST article on an 80m phased array. It explores the influence of ground conditions and element spacing on antenna performance, presenting EZNEC analysis for an 80m 4-Square with an elevated radial, showing how gain and beamwidth vary with spacing. Various 90-degree couplers, including the 3 dB hybrid coupler and the Reed Fisher coupler, are analyzed using LTSpice, detailing power splitting, phasing, and bandwidth characteristics. The resource quantifies power, voltage, current, and losses within a 4-Square system, addressing relays, capacitors, inductors, radiator radial systems, and cable losses. System impedance, bandwidth, SWR, isolation, and mutual coupling are discussed with practical construction aspects covering common mode chokes, phasing boxes, and remote control systems. Field test observations for 40m 4-Square antennas are included, with specific examples from DXpedition operations like 5A7A and VP6DX, providing real-world context to the theoretical and simulated results.

Demonstrates optimizing an **ON4UN-type 4 Square antenna** for enhanced performance across the lower HF bands, specifically 160m through 10m. The article details a design that utilizes a single support structure for the vertical elements, significantly reducing construction complexity and cost compared to traditional multi-tower setups. It emphasizes the use of **elevated radials** to achieve improved gain and a lower receive noise floor, providing insights into the design principles and practical installation tips for this directional array. K0UO shares his experience with this low-cost, high-gain solution, including the integration of a hybrid coupler phaser. The author's field testing confirms the benefits of elevated radials in achieving better far-field performance. The optimized 4 Square design offers a practical alternative for hams seeking a directional array without the extensive infrastructure typically required. Comparisons are drawn to traditional ground-mounted radial systems, highlighting the superior gain and reduced noise characteristics observed with the elevated configuration, making it a compelling option for DXing and contesting on the lower HF frequencies.