Search results

Demonstrates the construction of **magnetic loop antennas**, detailing both multi-turn and single-turn designs. It covers a 30-inch diameter multi-turn loop for 80 meters, based on a February 1996 QST article, and an octagon single-turn loop made from 15mm copper tube with a 4.8-meter circumference, operating from 7 MHz to 14 MHz. The document also presents a smaller 800mm diameter loop for 14 MHz to 28 MHz, emphasizing the importance of high-voltage tuning capacitors. Covers the design and construction of custom **butterfly capacitors** and piston capacitors, including a split stator capacitor with 140 pF capacitance and a 6000 Volt rating, and a butterfly capacitor with 5-65 pF and 7200 Volt rating. It explains why butterfly capacitors are preferred over split stator types for high power applications due to lower losses and direct series connection of rotors, reducing resistive losses from wiper contacts. Material recommendations include clear PVC for plates and brass or stainless steel for non-magnetic hardware. Addresses practical considerations such as feeding the loop with a shielded 1/5 Faraday loop made from RG213 or RG8 coax, achieving VSWR 1.1 across bands, and optimizing its placement 180° from the capacitor. It also discusses mechanical joint resistance, dissimilar metal oxidation prevention using Vaseline, and a simple method for determining radiation angle with a TL-light tube. The guide includes diagrams for rotor, stator, and end plate construction.

Determining the actual need for an antenna tuner often hinges on the specific antenna and feed line configuration in use. While many hams believe a tuner is always essential, its primary role is to present a 50-ohm impedance to the transceiver, not to "tune" the antenna itself. For instance, a resonant dipole fed with _coaxial cable_ at its design frequency typically requires no tuner, as the feed line impedance closely matches the radio's output. However, operating a non-resonant antenna, or using a resonant antenna on multiple bands, frequently necessitates a tuner to manage high Standing Wave Ratio (SWR) on the feed line. The article clarifies that a tuner placed at the transceiver only matches the radio to the feed line, not the antenna to the feed line. For maximum efficiency with a non-resonant antenna, an _automatic antenna tuner_ (ATU) or a remote tuner placed at the antenna feed point is often more effective, minimizing losses in the feed line. The discussion also touches on the practical implications of SWR, noting that modern transceivers often fold back power at high SWR, making a tuner a practical necessity to achieve full output power, even if the antenna itself is not perfectly matched.

Details the construction and optimization of antenna systems for amateur radio satellite operations, focusing on practical, homebrew solutions for VHF/UHF bands. It covers building _groundplane antennas_ from salvaged materials, recycling old beam antennas into new configurations like a 2-meter crossed yagi, and constructing a 10-meter horizontal delta loop. The resource also explains antenna matching techniques, including folded dipole driven elements and quarter-wave transformers, along with the importance of accurate SWR measurements and minimizing coax loss. Demonstrates how to achieve a **1:1 SWR** by carefully trimming elements and adjusting radial angles on groundplane antennas. It provides insights into selecting appropriate coax and connectors, highlighting the benefits of Belden 9913 for low loss and the proper installation of _N-connectors_. The article also addresses RFI mitigation from computer birdies and presents a design for a silent triac antenna control circuit, offering practical solutions for common satellite station challenges.

Presents the KE4UYP linear-loaded vertical antenna design, which introduces very little loss on 80 or 160 meters, achieving an overall radiation efficiency of 80% to 85%. This design addresses common pitfalls of traditional base-fed verticals by placing the majority of the current at the top of the antenna, eliminating the heavy reliance on extensive ground radial systems. The author's initial 10-meter model, only three feet tall, yielded 5/9 signal reports to Anchorage, AK, and Europe, confirming its effectiveness. The antenna incorporates both vertically and horizontally polarized radiators, with a 1/4 wavelength horizontal counterpoise located at the feed-point, near the top, to create an almost totally omnidirectional pattern with high wave angle horizontally polarized radiation. This dual polarization ensures even illumination across all take-off angles, making it effective for both local contacts and **DXing**. The vertical element is linear loaded, adding capacitance reactance and making it longer than the horizontal element to achieve resonance and raise the feed-point impedance to 50 ohms. Fine-tuning the antenna requires careful adjustment, as tower reactance can vary. The article suggests starting with 80 feet for 80m and 170 feet for 160m for the vertical wire, then trimming for resonance. Bandwidth specifications include 300 kHz under 2:1 **SWR** on 80m and 100 kHz on 160m when suspended between trees, or 150 kHz on 80m when side-mounted on a tower.

The 80-meter loop antenna, measuring 86 meters (282 feet) of wire, effectively operates across 8 HF bands from 80 through 10 meters, despite its length being a compromise for specific bands. This design prioritizes a "low enough" SWR across multiple bands, aiming for lower SWR values on higher frequencies due to increased feedline losses. A 200-ohm feedpoint impedance provides a workable SWR on every band, with feedpoint impedances ranging from 100 ohms for lower bands to 300 ohms for higher bands. Radiation patterns for the 80-meter loop, mounted at 15 meters high, show a maximum gain of 7.6 dBi at a 90-degree takeoff angle on 80 meters, and up to 12.9 dBi at a 10-degree takeoff angle on 12 meters. This configuration supports regional contacts on 80 meters and provides good DX performance on higher bands. Practical construction notes emphasize using robust supports like trees, ensuring wire slack with _egg insulators_ for wind resilience, and employing an oversized 2 kW 4:1 _balun_ to safely handle higher SWR conditions, even with 100W transceivers. Feedline losses are minimized using _LMR-400_ coax or ladder line, with power transfer efficiency between 80% and 95%. Antenna simulations were performed using _xnec2c_, and the provided NEC file is compatible with other NEC2 derivatives. The antenna is tunable on 6 of 8 bands with an internal ATU and all 8 bands with an external autotuner like the LDG AT-200 Pro.

This small window application will calculate Coax Cable loss from SWR and SWR from Cable Loss

The ZS6BKW multiband HF antenna, a design by ZS6BKW (G0GSF), functions effectively on multiple HF bands without requiring an Antenna Tuning Unit (ATU) for 40, 20, 17, 12, 10, and 6 meters. This antenna, approximately **27.51 meters** (90 feet) long with a 12.2-meter (40-foot) open-wire feeder, is a direct descendant of the _G5RV_ but offers superior multi-band resonance. It can be deployed as a horizontal dipole or an inverted-vee, with the latter requiring only a single support and maintaining an apex angle of at least 90 degrees to prevent signal cancellation. Performance data, recorded with an MFJ Antenna Analyser, indicates SWR values of 1:1 on 7.00 MHz (40m) and 14.06 MHz (20m), with SWR below 1.3:1 on 17m, 10m, and 6m. While primarily designed for these bands, the antenna can be adapted for 80m, 30m, and 15m with an ATU, preferably at the balanced feeder's base. The use of 450-ohm twin-lead for the feeder is recommended over 300-ohm for improved strength and reduced losses, especially in adverse weather conditions. This design, originally published in _RadCom_ in 1993 and featured in Pat Hawker’s "Antenna Topics," provides a compact and efficient solution for HF operation, particularly for those with limited space or resources.

ERP Calculator is an Amateur Radio software utility designed to perform a side-by-side comparison of two Ham Radio antenna systems. ERP Calculator comes pre-programmed with data files including published data for several popular brands and types of coax cable as well as several popular antenna system brands and models. ERP Calculator displays values of ERP, Antenna Power Gain, Antenna Feed point Power, Antenna System Gain in dB, Antenna Gain in dBd, SWR Attenuation in dB, SWR Power Attenuation, Coax Loss in dB, and Coax Power Loss

AEA Wireless Director Software Series turns PC's (running Windows 95/98/2000/ME or NT) into powerful tools that expand the use and power of SWR, Return Loss and Complex Impedance Analyzers.

Calculate Cable Loss from SWR and reverse. Text file with only two simply formulas

Various publications through the years have shown how the SWR measured on a shorted (or open) feed line can be used to calculate feed line attenuation

This calculator is designed to give the efficiency loss of a given antenna, based on the input of VSWR (voltage standing wave ratio) and other subsequent factors

Transmission Line Details. This utility program shows the impedance and SWR at both ends of a transmission line and the details of power loss in the line. It includes characteristics for over 40 built-in line types. You can modify these values to see how small changes affect the results or to specify custom lines. All program inputs may be changed directly or you can use spin buttons to make the changes. If you are using a moderately fast computer you can hold down a spinner and "watch the movie" on the charts as the results are recomputed. By AC6LA

A fractional bandwidth of up to 30:1 characterizes spiral antennas, making them highly effective across a very wide frequency range, often from 1 GHz to 30 GHz. The resource details two primary types: the **Log-Periodic Spiral Antenna** and the **Archimedean Spiral Antenna**, defining each with specific polar functions and illustrating their planar configurations. It explains that spiral antennas are typically circularly polarized, with a Half-Power Beamwidth (HPBW) of approximately 70-90 degrees, and a peak radiation direction perpendicular to the spiral plane. The content elaborates on critical design parameters affecting radiation, including the total length (outer radius) for lowest frequency, the flare rate ('a' constant) for optimal radiation versus capacitive behavior, the feed structure (often an infinite balun) for high-frequency operation, and the number of turns (typically 1.5 to 3 turns). It also discusses the theoretical impedance of 188 Ohms for Log-Periodic spirals, derived from Babinet's Principle, noting actual impedances are often 100-150 Ohms. The article presents a simple construction method for an Archimedean spiral, demonstrating VSWR and efficiency measurements. Measurements from a constructed spiral antenna show a VSWR that is fairly constant across the band, albeit with a mismatch loss of about 3 dB. The antenna efficiency remains around -5 dB (31.6%) across its operating range, indicating a decent wideband radiator despite opportunities for optimization.

Table of power loss to SWR relation

ladder-line is great - extremely low loss, even at high SWR. However, many hams refuse to use it because they are afflicted by common misconceptions

The article, "Using 75 Ohm CATV Coaxial Cable," details methods for employing readily available 75-ohm CATV hardline in standard 50-ohm amateur radio setups. It addresses the inherent impedance mismatch and practical considerations, such as connector compatibility, for hams seeking cost-effective, low-loss feedline solutions. The resource specifically contrasts common 50-ohm cables like RG-8, RG213, and _LMR-400_ with 75-ohm hardline, highlighting the latter's lower loss characteristics, particularly at VHF and UHF frequencies. It explores two primary approaches to manage the impedance difference: direct connection with an acceptable SWR compromise and precise impedance transformation. The direct connection method acknowledges that a perfect 1:1 SWR is not always critical, especially when using low-loss coax. For impedance transformation, the article explains the use of half-wavelength sections of coax to reflect the antenna's 50-ohm impedance back to the transmitter, noting its single-frequency effectiveness. It also briefly mentions transformer designs using toroid cores and a technique involving two 1/12 wavelength sections of feedline for broader bandwidth. The content further clarifies the concept of _velocity factor_ for calculating electrical versus physical cable lengths, providing a generic formula for precise length determination. It notes that while half-wave matching is practical for 10 meters and above, it can result in excessively long runs for lower bands like 160 meters, potentially adding **250 feet** of cable. The article also mentions achieving a usable bandwidth of 28.000 MHz up to at least **28.8 MHz** on 10 meters with specific transformation techniques.

1.5 dB of matched line loss can be calculated for a given transmission line using this online tool, which employs a model calibrated from empirical data. The calculator allows radio amateurs to input specific transmission line types, such as _RG-8_ or _RG-58_, and then determine the expected signal attenuation. This is crucial for optimizing antenna system efficiency and understanding power delivery to the radiating element, especially for HF and VHF operations where feedline losses can significantly impact performance. Beyond matched loss, the calculator also provides an estimate for mismatched loss if the Standing Wave Ratio (SWR) is specified. This feature helps operators quantify the additional power loss due to impedance discontinuities between the transceiver, feedline, and antenna, which is a common concern in amateur radio installations. Accurate loss calculations are vital for effective station design and for predicting actual radiated power. The tool's utility extends to various operating scenarios, from fixed station setups to portable deployments, aiding in the selection of appropriate feedline lengths and types to minimize signal degradation. Understanding these losses is a fundamental aspect of maximizing the effectiveness of any amateur radio antenna system.

This is an on-line rf attenuator calculator provided free in order to promote the FLEXI-BOX. Calculates the resistor values, attenuation, minimum attenuation, impedance, reflection coefficient, VSWR and return loss of a matching Pi attenuator

How is your SWR - determine the power loss to expect for a given SWR, includes an excel spreadsheet by n3ujj

Coaxial cable stripping for PL-259 connectors requires precise measurements to ensure optimal RF performance and mechanical integrity. For RG-8X, the outer jacket is stripped 1/2 inch, the braid 5/16 inch, and the dielectric 1/8 inch, leaving the center conductor exposed. RG-58 preparation involves a 1/2 inch jacket strip, 1/4 inch braid strip, and 1/8 inch dielectric strip. These specific dimensions facilitate proper soldering and crimping, minimizing impedance discontinuities at the connector interface. Different coaxial cable types, such as RG-8 and RG-213, necessitate varied stripping lengths due to their construction. The _PL-259_ connector, a common UHF type, relies on these exact preparations for a secure fit and low-loss connection. Incorrect stripping can lead to high SWR, RF leakage, and mechanical failure, impacting overall station efficiency. The guide details these critical dimensions for several popular coax cables. Using a dedicated _coax stripper_ tool or precise measurements with a utility knife improves consistency.

A deep analysis of UHF connectors performance tests, including return Loss of UHF Connectors, Mismatch Loss of UHF Connectors, SWR of UHF Connectors

Offers a range of high-performance RF interconnect solutions, addressing the critical need for reliable signal integrity across diverse radio frequency applications. Their product line includes custom cable assemblies, various **RF connectors** (such as SMA), adapters, and terminators, designed to meet stringent specifications from DC up to 40 GHz. These components are essential for maintaining low insertion loss and excellent VSWR in demanding environments, from test benches to operational communication systems. The company specializes in providing tailored solutions for both commercial and government sectors, emphasizing precision manufacturing in Warner Robins, Georgia. Their offerings are crucial for engineers and operators requiring specific lengths, connector types, and performance characteristics for their radio equipment and test setups. Ensuring robust connections and protection against transient voltage events, their **surge protectors** are integrated into systems to safeguard sensitive electronics from damage, a common concern in outdoor or high-power installations.

RF Feedline (Coax and Ladder-Line) Loss and ERP Calculators made with Javascript. This complex feddline loss calculator has already several line types paramenters for most common coaxial cables from Belden, Time LMR, Wireman and other common products. Result will give Matches loss, SWR loss, dB and Watts power loss.

Voldatech, a manufacturer based in China, produces a range of RF feeder cables and site components essential for amateur radio installations and telecommunication infrastructure. Their product line includes various types of coaxial cables, such as **50 Ohm** and 75 Ohm options, along with a comprehensive selection of connectors like N-type, UHF, and BNC. These components are critical for maintaining signal integrity and minimizing loss in antenna systems, whether for a home shack or a remote DXpedition setup. The company's focus on _RF Coax cables_ and connectors directly supports the needs of radio amateurs seeking reliable transmission lines for their transceivers and antennas. Amateurs often compare Voldatech's offerings to established brands, evaluating factors such as impedance matching, shielding effectiveness, and durability under various environmental conditions. The availability of diverse cable types allows operators to select optimal solutions for different frequency bands and power levels, from QRP to high-power amplifier setups. Their products are particularly relevant for those constructing new antenna arrays or upgrading existing feedline systems, aiming to achieve maximum power transfer and reduce standing wave ratio (SWR) for efficient signal propagation.

Enables Android users to operate various _miniVNA_ antenna analyzers via Bluetooth, USB, or Wi-Fi, providing a portable solution for RF measurements. The application supports full control over data acquisition, offering features like custom frequency range selection from 1 KHz to the VNA's full range, and automatic screen adaptation for diverse Android device resolutions. It facilitates intuitive, wizard-based calibration for both reflection and transmission modes, saving calibration data for different VNA types (Standard, Pro, Pro with Extender) to avoid repeated procedures. The software displays critical parameters such as SWR, |Z|, Return Loss, Phase, Rs, and |Xs| on 2-axis graphs or Smith charts, with multi-touch gestures for zoom and frequency shift. It includes a frequency generator mode with independent channels and attenuator control for the miniVNA Pro, along with a sweeper function. The cable data mode automatically calculates phase and loss, measures cable length from less than 1 meter to hundreds of meters, and includes a table of common coax cable velocity factors. An experimental X-tal mode measures resonance frequency, Rs, and Q. Data export options include CSV, ZPLOT, and S1P formats, with CSV import capability. The application also features an SM6ENG Audio mode for SWR tuning without visual reference and provides a miniVNA battery voltage indicator. It supports a wide frequency range, with the miniVNA Extender extending coverage up to **1500 MHz**. The application is compatible with Android version 2.2 and later, tested on devices like the _Galaxy TAB 7.7 P6800_.

Many antennas and antenna designers neglect the true cause of loss. The major problem using short antennas is the reactance, not the length

Steve Nichols, G0KYA, presents a practical examination of ground systems for vertical antennas, drawing heavily on the empirical research of Rudy Severns, N6LF. He explains that a robust radial field is crucial for ground-dependent verticals, effectively replacing the antenna's "missing half" and mitigating severe RF absorption in lossy soil. Nichols clarifies that surface radials do not strictly require a quarter-wavelength; instead, deploying a minimum of 16 to 32 shorter wires often yields superior results compared to fewer, longer ones. The presentation also addresses the common SWR paradox: a poor ground might show a perfect 1:1 match, but adding radials, while potentially raising the SWR to around 1.4:1, significantly improves true radiation efficiency. Nichols defines counterpoises as elevated wire networks that substitute for earth connections, offering solutions for limited-space installations, such as the **Folded Counterpoise (FCP)** for 160 meters. This resource provides actionable engineering data for optimizing vertical antenna performance.

This utility program shows the impedance and reflection coefficient parameters (SWR, reflection coefficient magnitude Rho, or Return Loss RL in dB) at both ends of a transmission line and the details of power loss in the line. It includes built-in specifications for approximately 100 different line types. You can modify the specs to see how small changes affect the results or to specify custom lines. All program inputs may be changed directly or you can use spin buttons to make the changes.

This article presents the C-Pole antenna project, a compact, ground-independent vertical antenna designed for amateur radio operators. It features a folded half-wave dipole configuration that eliminates the need for radials, making it suitable for various locations, especially in deed-restricted areas. The C-Pole offers efficient performance with a 2:1 SWR bandwidth of approximately 3%, and it can be easily constructed using common materials. Additionally, the article discusses practical aspects such as feed-point impedance transformation and balun design to optimize functionality and minimize losses.

In the pursuit of an affordable matching and SWR indication solution for the Pixie-based transceiver system this T-Tuner and SWR bridge unit, while not groundbreaking, proves to be a cost-effective performer. With real-world impedance testing yielding a worst-case loss below 0.9 dB, the unit efficiently matches all bands on 80 M to 10 M ham bands, making it a valuable addition to the QRP system.

This page provides construction details for a 4-element 10-meter Yagi antenna with 28 Ohm impedance. It includes information on the elements, positions, diagrams, and data related to frequency, gain, front-to-rear ratio, radiation resistance, SWR, and loss. The content is aimed at hams or radio operators interested in building and optimizing Yagi antennas for the 10-meter band.

The article explores the concepts of return loss, VSWR, and S11 within the context of microwave engineering, highlighting the confusion arising from their definitions. It clarifies that these parameters, while seemingly distinct, fundamentally describe the same phenomenon related to wave reflection and transmission in microwave circuits. The discussion emphasizes the historical context and mathematical relationships among these terms, revealing that their interpretation can vary significantly across different engineering disciplines. Ultimately, it advocates for a pragmatic approach to using these parameters based on familiarity rather than strict definitions.

This comprehensive article dispels common misconceptions about Standing Wave Ratio (SWR) in amateur radio. The author explains that SWR is not an antenna property but a measure of the entire antenna system, representing the mismatch between transmission line and load impedance. Contrary to popular belief, modest SWR values (under 3:1) typically cause minimal power loss in HF applications. The article demonstrates mathematically why obsession with achieving 1:1 SWR is often unnecessary, explains when SWR matters more (QRO, QRP, VHF/UHF), and explores effective matching techniques including proper ATU placement and quarter-wavelength transformers.

The FF-501DX LPF, a high-performance VHF and 10m filter, was obtained at a friend's SK sale. After becoming more active on 10m, the author reexamined the LPF and discovered it to be of high quality. The filter's efficiency was outstanding and the return loss/VSWR was better than estimated. The LPF was connected to a Bird 50R dummy load to evaluate insert loss, cutoff, attenuation over 70MHz, and return loss. The original specifications were found in an old radio magazine, along with a link to the original one-page information sheet. Comparing the results to the original specs confirms the LPF's quality.

This page provides a calculator to determine the total line loss and additional line loss in your transmission line based on the level of SWR. It helps hams understand the impact of high SWR on transmission line losses. The calculator allows users to input their SWR level and get accurate calculations of total losses. This tool is useful for ham radio operators looking to optimize their transmission setups and improve overall efficiency.